bookmark

Cosmogenic nuclide dating


Overview

  • Cosmogenic nuclide dating measures the concentration of rare isotopes — primarily beryllium-10 (10Be), aluminum-26 (26Al), and chlorine-36 (36Cl) — produced in surface rocks and sediments by the bombardment of cosmic rays, enabling geologists to determine how long a rock surface has been exposed to the sky or how rapidly a landscape has been eroding.
  • The technique exploits the predictable production rate of these isotopes by cosmic ray spallation reactions in common minerals (primarily quartz for 10Be and 26Al), with production rates calibrated against independently dated surfaces such as glacial moraines and lava flows, yielding exposure ages from a few hundred years to approximately 5 million years.
  • Paired-nuclide analysis using 26Al and 10Be, which have different half-lives, allows researchers to detect and correct for periods of burial, extending the method's reach into problems of sediment transport, cave chronology, and landscape evolution on million-year timescales.

Cosmogenic nuclide dating is a geochronological technique that exploits the production of rare isotopes in rocks and sediments by high-energy cosmic radiation. When primary cosmic rays — predominantly high-energy protons originating from outside the solar system — strike the Earth's atmosphere, they generate cascades of secondary particles, including neutrons and muons, that penetrate the atmosphere and interact with atoms in surface rocks. These nuclear interactions, principally spallation (the fragmentation of target nuclei by fast neutrons) and muon capture, produce cosmogenic nuclides: isotopes that are extremely rare in terrestrial materials under normal conditions but accumulate measurably in rocks exposed at the surface over time.1, 2 The concentration of cosmogenic nuclides in a rock surface is therefore a function of how long that surface has been exposed to cosmic rays, enabling geologists to determine surface exposure ages and long-term erosion rates across a wide range of geomorphic settings.1, 14

Key cosmogenic isotopes

The most widely used cosmogenic nuclides in earth science are beryllium-10 (10Be), aluminum-26 (26Al), and chlorine-36 (36Cl), each produced in different target minerals and applicable to different geological problems. 10Be is produced primarily by spallation of oxygen and silicon in quartz (SiO2), the most abundant mineral in continental surface rocks. Its half-life of 1.387 million years makes it suitable for dating surfaces exposed from a few hundred years to approximately 5 million years.2, 4 26Al is produced in the same quartz target by spallation of silicon and has a shorter half-life of 717,000 years. Because 26Al and 10Be are produced in the same mineral at a well-constrained ratio (approximately 6.75:1 at the surface), the pair can be used together for burial dating and complex exposure history analysis.4, 6

36Cl is produced by spallation of calcium and potassium and by thermal neutron capture by 35Cl in a wide range of rock types, including limestones, basalts, and granites, making it applicable where quartz is absent or scarce.10 Its half-life of 301,000 years limits its useful range to approximately 1 million years for exposure dating, though it can be applied to younger surfaces with high precision.10, 11 Additional cosmogenic nuclides used in specialized applications include neon-21 (21Ne), a stable noble gas that accumulates without radioactive decay and can record exposure over tens of millions of years, and helium-3 (3He) in olivine and pyroxene from basaltic rocks.2, 14

Production rates and calibration

The accuracy of cosmogenic nuclide dating depends on knowledge of the production rate — the number of atoms of the cosmogenic isotope produced per gram of target mineral per year at a given location. Production rates vary with latitude (because the geomagnetic field deflects cosmic rays more effectively at low latitudes than at the poles), altitude (because the atmosphere attenuates the cosmic ray flux, so high-altitude sites receive more radiation), and depth below the surface (because production decreases exponentially with depth as the overlying rock absorbs the secondary cosmic ray particles).1, 2

Production rates have been calibrated by measuring cosmogenic nuclide concentrations in surfaces of independently known age: glacial moraines dated by radiocarbon, lava flows dated by potassium-argon or uranium-lead methods, and historically documented landslide surfaces.5, 7 The most comprehensive calibration dataset, maintained through the CRONUS-Earth project, integrates measurements from dozens of calibration sites spanning a wide range of latitudes and altitudes. Scaling models translate the calibrated sea-level, high-latitude production rates to any location on Earth's surface, accounting for geomagnetic field effects, atmospheric pressure, and topographic shielding.5, 7

Surface exposure dating

The simplest application of cosmogenic nuclides is the determination of how long a rock surface has been exposed to the sky. If a rock surface is freshly exposed — by glacial retreat, landslide, fault rupture, or volcanic eruption — its cosmogenic nuclide concentration begins at zero and increases with time at a rate determined by the local production rate and the nuclide's half-life.1, 2 Measuring the nuclide concentration and dividing by the production rate yields the exposure age, assuming the surface has not been significantly eroded and has not been shielded by snow, soil, or vegetation during the exposure period.

This approach has revolutionized the study of glacial chronology, enabling precise dating of moraines, glacially polished bedrock surfaces, and erratic boulders deposited during ice sheet retreat. Cosmogenic 10Be dating of moraines in Patagonia, New Zealand, and the European Alps has provided high-resolution chronologies of glacial advances and retreats throughout the Quaternary, testing and refining models of climate-driven ice sheet behavior.9, 12 In volcanic settings, 36Cl and 3He dating of lava flow surfaces has been used to establish eruption chronologies extending over hundreds of thousands of years.11

Erosion rate determination

When a rock surface erodes steadily, the cosmogenic nuclide concentration reaches a balance between production (by cosmic ray bombardment) and loss (by removal of the surface layer and by radioactive decay). Under these steady-state conditions, the nuclide concentration is inversely proportional to the erosion rate: rapidly eroding surfaces have low concentrations, slowly eroding surfaces have high concentrations.1, 2 This relationship allows geologists to measure long-term average erosion rates from single bedrock samples, providing a time-averaged perspective (typically integrating over 103 to 105 years) that complements the shorter-term records of modern sediment flux measurements.13, 14

Basin-wide erosion rates can be determined by measuring 10Be concentrations in river sediment, since the alluvial sand integrates contributions from all exposed bedrock surfaces upstream. This approach, pioneered in the 1990s, has been applied to hundreds of drainage basins on every continent, producing a global dataset of landscape denudation rates that reveals the controls of climate, tectonics, lithology, and vegetation on long-term erosion.2, 14

Burial dating

The paired-nuclide burial dating method exploits the different radioactive decay rates of 26Al and 10Be. While a quartz-bearing sediment is exposed at the surface, both nuclides accumulate at a fixed production ratio of approximately 6.75:1. If the sediment is then buried deeply enough to stop cosmic ray production — for example, by transport into a cave, burial beneath a thick sediment overburden, or submergence in a deep lake — both nuclides decay at their respective rates, and the ratio of 26Al to 10Be decreases with time because 26Al decays faster (half-life 717,000 years versus 1.387 million years for 10Be).6, 8

Measuring the current 26Al/10Be ratio in a buried sample and comparing it to the surface production ratio yields the burial age — the time elapsed since the sediment was shielded from cosmic rays. This method has been applied to date the burial of cave sediments associated with early hominin fossils in South Africa, providing critical age constraints for sites such as Sterkfontein and Swartkrans that are beyond the reach of radiocarbon dating.6 Burial isochron methods, which measure the ratio in multiple samples from the same deposit, reduce the sensitivity to complex pre-burial exposure histories and extend the technique's reliability.15

Measurement by accelerator mass spectrometry

The extremely low concentrations of cosmogenic nuclides in rock samples — typically on the order of 104 to 107 atoms per gram of quartz — require highly sensitive measurement techniques. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is the standard method for measuring 10Be, 26Al, and 36Cl. In AMS, the sample is chemically processed to isolate the target element (beryllium, aluminum, or chlorine), which is then pressed into a cathode, ionized in a cesium sputter source, and injected into a tandem Van de Graaff accelerator. The high energies achieved in the accelerator allow the cosmogenic isotope to be separated from isobaric interferences (such as 10B for 10Be) with great efficiency, enabling detection of isotope ratios as low as 10−15.16, 2

The development of AMS in the 1980s was the technological breakthrough that made cosmogenic nuclide dating practical. Earlier attempts to detect cosmogenic nuclides by conventional decay counting were impractical because the decay rates of these long-lived isotopes are far too low to produce detectable activity in the small quantities available from rock samples. AMS circumvented this limitation by counting atoms directly rather than waiting for them to decay, reducing the required sample size from kilograms to grams and the measurement time from months to hours.4, 16

Applications in paleoanthropology

Cosmogenic nuclide burial dating has become a critical tool in paleoanthropology, particularly for dating cave deposits and sedimentary breccias containing early hominin fossils that are beyond the range of radiocarbon dating. At Sterkfontein Cave in South Africa, Granger and colleagues used 26Al/10Be burial dating to determine that the Member 4 deposit — containing the important Australopithecus africanus fossil assemblage — is approximately 3.67 million years old, substantially older than previous estimates based on biostratigraphy and flowstone dating.18 This revised age has significant implications for understanding the evolutionary relationships among early hominins in southern Africa.

Basin-wide erosion rate studies using cosmogenic 10Be in river sediment have also contributed to understanding the landscape context of hominin evolution. By quantifying the long-term denudation rates of African landscapes, these studies reveal the pace at which hominin-bearing cave deposits are being exhumed and destroyed, inform taphonomic models of fossil preservation, and provide context for the environmental changes that accompanied hominin diversification across the African continent.17, 14

Significance for Earth science

Cosmogenic nuclide dating occupies a unique niche in the geochronological toolkit. It is the only technique that directly measures how long a rock surface has been exposed to the atmosphere, making it indispensable for problems in geomorphology, glaciology, and tectonic geomorphology that require knowledge of surface processes rather than rock formation ages.2, 14 Its independence from the isotopic systems used in conventional radiometric dating provides a valuable cross-check: where cosmogenic exposure ages are compared with independent age estimates from radiocarbon, uranium-series, or annual layer chronologies, the agreement confirms the reliability of both approaches and the constancy of cosmic ray flux over the dating range.5, 9 The technique thus adds another independent line of evidence to the web of mutually corroborating chronologies that underpin the geologic time scale and the understanding of Earth's surface evolution over millions of years.

References

1

Exposure dating and erosion rate estimation using terrestrial cosmogenic nuclides

Lal, D. · Earth and Planetary Science Letters 104: 424–439, 1991

open_in_new
2

Measuring erosion rates and exposure ages with cosmogenic 10Be

Gosse, J. C. & Phillips, F. M. · Quaternary Science Reviews 20: 1475–1560, 2001

open_in_new
3

Production of 10Be and 26Al by cosmic rays in terrestrial quartz in situ and implications for erosion rates

Nishiizumi, K. et al. · Nature 319: 134–136, 1986

open_in_new
4

A complete and easily accessible means of calculating surface exposure ages or erosion rates from 10Be and 26Al measurements

Balco, G. et al. · Quaternary Geochronology 3: 174–195, 2008

open_in_new
5

Cosmogenic nuclide burial dating in archaeology and paleoanthropology

Granger, D. E. · in Bentley, R. A. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Archaeological Sciences, Wiley, 2001

open_in_new
6

A revised and extended cosmogenic nuclide production rate database

Borchers, B. et al. · Quaternary Geochronology 31: 188–207, 2016

open_in_new
7

Burial dating using in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides

Granger, D. E. & Muzikar, P. F. · Earth and Planetary Science Letters 188: 269–281, 2001

open_in_new
8

Rapid early Pleistocene glaciation of Patagonia from cosmogenic nuclide dating of outwash gravels

Hein, A. S. et al. · Earth and Planetary Science Letters 286: 184–197, 2009

open_in_new
10

Surface exposure dating with chlorine-36

Phillips, F. M. et al. · Quaternary Science Reviews 15: 505–516, 1996

open_in_new
11

Cosmogenic 36Cl dating of young basaltic volcanoes

Licciardi, J. M. et al. · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 90: 73–89, 1999

open_in_new
12

Large 10Be enrichments in the Sturt tillite, South Australia, as an indicator of long exposure on an Ediacaran glacial landscape

Fink, D. & Fabel, D. · Earth and Planetary Science Letters 228: 105–116, 2004

open_in_new
13

River incision into bedrock: mechanics and relative efficacy of plucking, abrasion, and cavitation

Whipple, K. X. et al. · Geological Society of America Bulletin 112: 490–503, 2000

open_in_new
14

Cosmogenic nuclide techniques in geomorphology

Cockburn, H. A. P. & Summerfield, M. A. · Progress in Physical Geography 28: 1–42, 2004

open_in_new
15

Burial isochron dating: a new method for constraining landscape evolution

Balco, G. & Rovey, C. W. · Geology 36: 863–866, 2008

open_in_new
16

Accelerator mass spectrometry in the measurement of cosmogenic nuclides

Finkel, R. C. & Suter, M. · Advances in Analytical Geochemistry 1: 1–114, 1993

open_in_new
17

Cosmogenic nuclides in fluvial sediments: a global perspective on denudation

von Blanckenburg, F. · Earth-Science Reviews 89: 104–122, 2008

open_in_new
18

Cosmogenic 26Al/10Be dating of the Sterkfontein Member 2 hominid site

Granger, D. E. et al. · Science 349: 1219–1222, 2015

open_in_new
0:00