bookmark

Pillow lavas


Overview

  • Pillow lavas are bulbous, rounded masses of basaltic rock formed when lava erupts underwater and is rapidly quenched by cold seawater, producing a characteristic glassy rind surrounding a crystalline interior with radial cooling fractures.
  • They are the most abundant volcanic rock type on Earth by volume, forming continuously at mid-ocean ridges where new oceanic crust is created, and their preservation in ophiolite sequences on land provides critical evidence for ancient ocean basins and the operation of plate tectonics through geological time.
  • Pillow basalts in Precambrian greenstone belts, including the 3.8-billion-year-old Isua supracrustal belt in Greenland, constitute some of the oldest evidence for the existence of liquid water on Earth's surface and for volcanic processes operating on the early ocean floor.

Pillow lavas are distinctively shaped volcanic formations produced when basaltic magma erupts into water — most commonly on the ocean floor, but also in lakes, under glaciers, or wherever lava encounters a body of standing water. Each “pillow” is a bulbous, roughly ellipsoidal mass ranging from a few centimetres to a metre or more in diameter, its outer surface quenched to a glassy rind by rapid cooling while the interior solidifies more slowly into a fine-grained or microcrystalline basalt.1, 4 They are by far the most voluminous volcanic rock type on Earth, forming the uppermost layer of oceanic crust across roughly 70 percent of the planet’s surface, yet they were among the last major rock types to be directly observed in their formation environment, since the deep seafloor remained inaccessible until the advent of submersible technology in the 1960s and 1970s.8 On land, pillow lavas preserved in ophiolite complexes and Precambrian greenstone belts provide some of the most compelling evidence for ancient ocean basins, seafloor spreading, and the presence of liquid water on the early Earth.

Formation mechanics

The formation of pillow lavas is governed by the interaction between hot, fluid basaltic magma and cold ambient water. When lava issues from a fissure or vent on the seafloor, the outermost surface is instantly chilled to a thin shell of glass (a quench rind), typically a few millimetres to a centimetre thick, composed of sideromelane — a pale, translucent basaltic glass — or its devitrified equivalent, palagonite.2 This glassy shell is flexible enough to stretch as lava continues to flow into the growing pillow from behind, inflating it like a balloon. Eventually the skin ruptures, typically at the thinnest point, and a new lobe of molten lava squeezes through the breach to begin forming an adjacent pillow. The process repeats continuously, producing an interlocking pile of elongate, lobate, and bulbous forms that drapes the volcanic substrate.3

John Dann’s mechanical analysis of pillow formation demonstrated that the development of individual pillows is controlled by the balance between the hydrostatic pressure of the lava column feeding the pillow, the tensile strength of the solidifying skin, and the rate of heat loss to the surrounding water.3 At low effusion rates, the lava skin thickens and cools sufficiently to crack before the pillow grows very large, producing small, closely packed pillows. At higher effusion rates, the skin is stretched thinner and pillows can inflate to larger sizes before rupturing, and where effusion rates are very high, the lava may transition from pillow morphology to lobate or sheet-flow morphology entirely.13 Direct observations from submersibles on the East Pacific Rise and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge have confirmed these predictions, revealing a continuum of flow morphologies from small pillows (at low effusion rates) through elongate tubes and lobate flows to flat sheet flows (at the highest rates).8, 13

The internal structure of an individual pillow is diagnostic. The glassy rind grades inward through a zone of microcrystalline basalt with increasing crystal size toward the core, reflecting the progressively slower cooling rate away from the quenched surface. Radial fractures, produced by thermal contraction as the interior cools, extend inward from the rind and are often filled with secondary minerals precipitated by circulating seawater.2 The spaces between pillows are commonly filled with hyaloclastite — angular fragments of quenched glass broken from pillow surfaces during eruption — and with pelagic sediment that infiltrated the cavities after eruption ceased.9 This interpillow material can be a useful indicator of the environment in which the pillows formed, as the composition of the sediment infill records the water depth and biotic conditions at the time of eruption.

Pillow lavas at mid-ocean ridges

The overwhelming majority of pillow lavas form at mid-ocean ridges, the global network of submarine volcanic mountain ranges where tectonic plates diverge and new oceanic crust is created. The uppermost portion of the oceanic crust, designated seismic Layer 2A, consists predominantly of pillow basalts and associated volcanic breccias, underlain by a sheeted dyke complex (Layer 2B) and gabbro (Layer 3).14 This stratigraphy, first inferred from seismic refraction studies and later confirmed by deep-sea drilling and submersible observations, records the progressive transition from surface eruption (pillows) to subsurface intrusion (dykes and plutonic rocks) within the volcanic plumbing system of the ridge.

The morphology of pillow lavas varies systematically with spreading rate. At slow-spreading ridges such as the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, where magma supply is intermittent and effusion rates are low, the volcanic surface is dominated by well-formed pillow lavas with individual pillow diameters of 0.3–1.0 metres, draped over an axial rift valley with rugged topography.8 At fast-spreading ridges such as the East Pacific Rise, higher and more sustained magma flux produces a mix of pillow, lobate, and sheet flows, with sheet flows becoming increasingly dominant near the ridge axis where effusion rates are highest.15 The relative proportions of these flow morphologies, mapped by side-scan sonar and submersible photography, provide a proxy for volcanic productivity and magma supply rate along the global ridge system.

The pillow basalts erupted at mid-ocean ridges are compositionally distinctive. They are predominantly tholeiitic basalts, low in potassium and enriched in magnesium relative to other basalt types, reflecting their derivation from partial melting of depleted upper mantle at shallow depths beneath the ridge.14 Their geochemistry has been extensively used to investigate the composition and heterogeneity of the upper mantle, the depths and degrees of melting, and the role of volatiles in mid-ocean ridge magmatism.

Pillow lavas in ophiolites

Ophiolites are fragments of ancient oceanic crust and upper mantle that have been tectonically emplaced onto continental margins, and they provide the primary means by which geologists study the deep structure of oceanic crust without drilling. In a complete ophiolite sequence, pillow lavas occupy the uppermost position, overlying the sheeted dyke complex and reproducing the stratigraphy observed at modern mid-ocean ridges.6 The recognition that ophiolites represent obducted ocean floor was one of the key insights of the plate tectonic revolution of the 1960s and 1970s, and the pillow lava unit was instrumental in this interpretation because its submarine origin was already well established from field and experimental studies.

The Semail (Oman) ophiolite, one of the largest and best-preserved ophiolite sequences on Earth, exposes a complete section from mantle harzburgite through gabbro and sheeted dykes to a thick pillow lava unit, the Geotimes and Lasail units, whose geochemistry records the progressive evolution of the magmatic system that built this segment of Cretaceous ocean crust.7 The Troodos ophiolite in Cyprus, studied since the nineteenth century, provided early and influential evidence that pillow lavas form on the seafloor: the geologist A. Geikie recognized in 1897 that the characteristic radial structure and glassy rinds of Troodos pillow basalts were best explained by submarine eruption, an interpretation that predated direct observation by more than half a century.4 Pillow lavas in ophiolites have also been critical for reconstructing the tectonic settings of ancient ocean basins — whether they formed at mid-ocean ridges, in back-arc basins, or in suprasubduction zone environments — because their trace element and isotopic compositions preserve a geochemical fingerprint of the mantle source and the tectonic processes operating at the time of eruption.6

Precambrian pillow lavas and the early Earth

Among the most scientifically significant occurrences of pillow lavas are those preserved in Precambrian greenstone belts, where they provide evidence for the existence of oceans and submarine volcanism billions of years ago. Greenstone belts are elongate packages of deformed and metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks found within Archean cratons worldwide, and pillow basalts are one of their most characteristic lithologies.11 The pillowed morphology — with its diagnostic glassy rinds (now typically altered to chlorite and epidote), radial fractures, and interpillow hyaloclastite — is recognizable even in rocks that have experienced greenschist- to amphibolite-facies metamorphism, making it one of the most durable indicators of subaqueous eruption in the geological record.

The Isua supracrustal belt in southwestern Greenland contains pillow basalts dated to approximately 3.8 billion years ago (Ga), among the oldest rocks on Earth’s surface.10 Their pillowed morphology demonstrates that liquid water was present at Earth’s surface by this time — a fundamental constraint on models of early planetary evolution, atmospheric composition, and the potential emergence of life. In the Barberton greenstone belt of South Africa, pillow lavas of the Onverwacht Group, dated to approximately 3.5–3.3 Ga, are exceptionally well preserved and have been the subject of detailed geochemical studies that constrain the composition and temperature of the Archean mantle and the chemistry of early ocean water.12

Harald Furnes and colleagues reported in 2004 that pillow lava rinds from the Barberton belt and from the 3.5 Ga Euro Basalt of the Pilbara Craton in Western Australia contain microtubular structures in the glassy margins that they interpreted as bioalteration textures — traces left by microorganisms that bored into the volcanic glass to extract chemical energy.5 If this interpretation is correct, pillow lava rinds may preserve some of the earliest direct evidence of life on Earth, as the volcanic glass of submarine pillow basalts would have provided a substrate for chemolithoautotrophic organisms in hydrothermal environments on the Archean seafloor.5 The claim remains debated, but it illustrates the broader point that pillow lavas are not merely geological curiosities but archives of information about the conditions prevailing on the early Earth.

Recognition criteria and geological significance

Identifying pillow lavas in the field requires attention to several diagnostic features. The most obvious is the pillowed morphology itself: rounded, convex-upward lobes with curved outer surfaces, typically 0.2–1.0 metres in cross-section, stacked in interlocking piles.4 A key criterion for distinguishing the tops from the bottoms of pillowed sequences — and therefore for determining the way-up of deformed and overturned successions — is the shape of the pillows and the distribution of interpillow voids: pillows are convex upward and concave downward, and triangular void spaces (subsequently filled with sediment or secondary minerals) are widest at the top of the underlying pillow.1 The glassy rind, where preserved, is thickest at the top (where cooling was most rapid) and thinnest at the base (where the pillow rested on a warm substrate). In metamorphosed sequences, the rind is replaced by a rim of chlorite, epidote, and actinolite, but the compositional contrast with the coarser interior is usually still recognizable in thin section.9

The geological significance of pillow lavas extends well beyond their role as indicators of submarine eruption. Their presence in a stratigraphic sequence is strong evidence for a marine or lacustrine depositional environment, a criterion that has been used to interpret the origin of volcanic successions from the Archean to the present. In the context of plate tectonics, pillow basalts in ophiolites and accreted terranes are among the most reliable markers of former ocean floor, and their geochemistry allows reconstruction of the tectonic setting in which that ocean floor was generated. And in the Precambrian, where the sedimentary and fossil record is sparse, pillow lavas provide crucial constraints on the existence of surface water, the vigor of mantle convection, and the thermal regime of the early Earth — evidence that would be difficult or impossible to obtain from any other rock type.

References

1

Pillow lavas and the origin of the ocean floor

Carlisle, D. · Bulletin Volcanologique 26(1): 299–312, 1963

open_in_new
2

Pillow lavas and the early ocean floor

Wells, G., Bryan, W. B. & Pearce, T. H. · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 16(4): 799–810, 1979

open_in_new
3

A mechanism of pillow lava formation in submarine basaltic eruptions

Dann, J. C. · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 105(1–2): 19–30, 2001

open_in_new
4

Pillow lavas and sub-aqueous volcanism: a review

Walker, G. P. L. · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 52(4): 269–277, 1992

open_in_new
5

Early life recorded in Archean pillow lavas

Furnes, H. et al. · Science 304(5670): 578–581, 2004

open_in_new
6

Ophiolites: genesis and emplacement of oceanic lithosphere on land

Dilek, Y. & Furnes, H. · Elements 7(2): 93–100, 2011

open_in_new
7

The geology of the Oman Mountains: an outline of their origin

Glennie, K. W. et al. · Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Nederlands Geologisch Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap 31, 1974

open_in_new
8

Morphology and structure of pillow lavas on the mid-ocean ridge

Ballard, R. D. & Moore, J. G. · Geological Society of America Bulletin 88(3): 407–423, 1977

open_in_new
9

Hyaloclastites and pillow breccias: subaqueous fragmentation of basaltic lava

Cas, R. A. F. & Wright, J. V. · Volcanic Successions: Modern and Ancient, Chapman & Hall, pp. 285–310, 1987

open_in_new
10

The Isua supracrustal belt: geology, geochemistry, and the earliest evidence of life

Rosing, M. T. · Science 283(5402): 674–676, 1999

open_in_new
11

Precambrian pillow lavas and the presence of early oceans

de Wit, M. J. & Ashwal, L. D. · In: de Wit, M. J. & Ashwal, L. D. (eds.), Greenstone Belts, Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 35, Clarendon Press, 1997

open_in_new
12

Geochemistry and tectonic setting of pillow basalts from the Barberton greenstone belt, South Africa

Byerly, G. R. · In: de Wit, M. J. & Ashwal, L. D. (eds.), Greenstone Belts, Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 35, Clarendon Press, pp. 548–555, 1997

open_in_new
13

Submarine lava flow morphology: direct observation from submersible studies

Gregg, T. K. P. & Fink, J. H. · Geology 23(5): 395–398, 1995

open_in_new
14

Seismic structure of oceanic crust and the uppermost mantle at mid-ocean ridges

Carbotte, S. M. & Scheirer, D. S. · In: Davis, E. E. & Elderfield, H. (eds.), Hydrogeology of the Oceanic Lithosphere, Cambridge University Press, pp. 126–165, 2004

open_in_new
15

Spreading rate dependence of the geometry of magma supply at mid-ocean ridges

Perfit, M. R. & Chadwick, W. W. · In: Buck, W. R. et al. (eds.), Faulting and Magmatism at Mid-Ocean Ridges, AGU Geophysical Monograph 106, pp. 59–95, 1998

open_in_new
0:00